As I browse the internet, I find security news that I find interesting. Here is one such article:
Original article from Darknet – The Darkside
Original article posted on August 13, 2014 at 11:15AM
Posted by Xavier Ashe on January 2, 2014
Welcome to 2014 everyone. This year is going to be better than the last one, right?! Well, to set you up for success, I suggest you do the things listed below. Skip to the List. Most folks, unless you’ve already been a victim of identity theft, have a “probably won’t happen to me” mentality when it comes to security and privacy threats. Have you ever said:
Those rationalizations are all rooted in truth, and if I wasn’t in the security business, I would probably fall right in line with you. However, I am in the security industry, and I see it all. I read nearly all the published breach reports. I have access to tons of unpublished breach information, and I’ve been personally involved in cleaning up several of the high profile breaches this year.
So you would expect me to advise people and companies to SECURE IT ALL! Well, I think there’s a lot of truth to the third bullet above. Between government agencies like the NSA & China, organized crime syndication, and that bored teenager down the street, there’s not much you can do to be 100% secure. It’s impossible to SECURE IT ALL!
What can be done? I call it “Good Enough Security”. Follow these steps to figure out what you need to do. This is the same process I take companies through, and it works just as well on a personal level.
The security buzzwords for the above list are 1) know your assets 2) know the threat and 3) identify vulnerabilities. It is the core of what we like to call a risk analysis.
Okay, but what about you? The individual with a laptop, iPhone and iPad, a Facebook account, credit cards and a bank account. What are some simple ways of setting yourself up for success in the New Year?
If you have any other simple security tips, send them my way. Here’s to having a safe 2014!
Posted by Xavier Ashe on August 8, 2013
As if today wasn’t “exciting” enough, I just broke up a domestic dispute.
I am at a hospital with my wife who is recovering from some surgery. I decided to wonder the halls around 10 pm, looking for a snack. There was this guy following a few feet behind a girl saying things like “What? What am I doing? I’m just walking”. The girl was visibly upset and was telling him to go away, over and over. I watched for a while, acting like I was playing on my phone. I was hoping to see a silly argument, but it was apparent that he was just harassing her.
I walked over and told him, “I think she’s made her self clear. You need to turn around now.” I was prepared for him to get angry and take it out on me, but he just seemed broken. His shoulders slumped and his voice changed.
“But she’s my wife.”
I could see the pain in his eyes. “I’ve been there man. Sometimes it’s better not to push too hard. She needs her space right now”.
He kept repeating, “but she’s my wife” and, “where am I supposed to go?”
“Somewhere else in the hospital. I don’t know what you guys are going through, but she doesn’t want to be around you right now.”
“She’s got my baby in her belly.” He looked down the hallway in the opposite direction, wrestling with something in his mind.
I kept him in still, chatting away to let the girl get some distance. I walked on, hoping that was enough. I didn’t think this was going turn ugly, but your never know.
As I rounded the corner, she reappeared looking for a way out of the building. He started to approach again, but I walked her to the nearest open exit. As we exited, he got closer. I let her leave (I think she was was looking for a place to smoke).
“I don’t know anything about you two, but you are doing nothing but harassing her right now. You could be nicest guy in the world, or you could be violent type. Right now you need to back off.”
There was an intense glare from him. You could see the rage building in his eyes. “Oh shit, here we go” I thought. I put one foot back, leaned back for balance, and prepared for him to go ape shit. Then something broke inside his eyes. His muscles loosen and he looked at his feet. He silently walk outside, but in the opposite direction of the girl.
I noticed a police car in a adjacent building, and walked over. It was a sheriff. I gave him a run down of what was going on and he pulled his car around to the girl. I had to walk half way around the hospital to find a door that was opened. I headed back to my wife’s room.
Did I help or hurt? It’s so hard to tell. My southern upbringing makes me defend the girl, but I wish I could help the guy. He wasn’t a clear asshole or jerk. Things are never that black or white. He didn’t need to be “taught a lesson”. She might have been the biggest bitch in the world. Or, considering where we are, there could be a huge decision that she has to make.
So many possibilities, so many outcomes. I just hope I made the right call.
Funny enough, as I was walking around trying to get back in the hospital, I thought of Joe Peacock’s stories. It made me laugh out loud as I thought, “What would Joe do?” It would have probably involved a Waffle House.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on May 8, 2013
EDIT: New information about FinFisher was released by F-Secure on August 30, 2013.
Originally posted on the Bit9 Corporate Blog.
As I reviewed recent headlines, I took note of a company out of the U.K., Gamma International, that makes purpose-built spying tools. Their software offering is called FinFisher (aka FinSpy). The buzz phrase they use is “lawful intercept,” which means that its use should be bound by laws that allow spying in certain circumstances. Personally, I file it under “greyware,” considering it could be used legally or illegally to remotely control or embed cyberespionage tools within benign looking software. So how do organizations secure themselves against these kinds of tools?
Last year Morgan Marquis-Boire, a security researcher at the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs, and Bill Marczak, a computer science doctoral student at the University of California, Berkeley, found emails containing surveillance tools traced back to Gamma International. More recently, those researchers found the command-and-control server for FinFisher running in 36 countries. According to Mikko Hypponen of F-Secure, Gamma International even tried to sell FinFisher to the Egyptian Government under former President Mubarak.
As the New York Times reported in March:
Martin J. Muench, a Gamma Group managing director, has said his company does not disclose its customers but that Gamma Group sold its technology to governments only to monitor criminals. He said that it was most frequently used “against pedophiles, terrorists, organized crime, kidnapping and human trafficking.”
But evidence suggests the software is being sold to governments where the potential for abuse is high. “If you look at the list of countries that Gamma is selling to, many do not have a robust rule of law,” Mr. Marquis-Boire said. “Rather than catching kidnappers and drug dealers, it looks more likely that it is being used for politically motivated surveillance.”
The Citizen Lab released research on the topic a few days ago titled “For Their Eyes Only: The Commercialization of Digital Spying.” The data in this report is shocking in many ways, including a mobile version of FinSpy that follows the same path as its desktop equivalent.
They also have a sample package that realistically masquerades as Mozilla’s Firefox. They copied so many details that Mozilla sent Gamma International a cease-and-desist letter, according to Wired. As you see in the screenshot below, the properties of the executable are identical. How would one ever know the difference? You could rely on virus scanners, but without a sample of the malicious code they won’t be able to detect or stop it.
The tried-and-true security tools that most of us depend on are reactive. You have to wait on security researchers to tear apart samples that they find in the wild to give you reactive protection. It’s the same old cat-and-mouse game that leaves you open to attack.
Fortunately, there is a way to end the game. The Bit9 Trust-based Security Platform takes a different approach by blocking the execution of untrusted files across endpoints and servers. Let’s look through the Citizen Lab’s research paper and see how Bit9 would stop these threats.
Malware comes in various shapes and sizes, with some written by criminals and others written by private companies. Keeping up with these advanced threats requires a new approach to security. Bit9 ensures that only trusted software can run, as opposed to relying on deep analysis of already-known threats that can take time and money to defend against while still leaving you unsecure. A trust-based approach is the most secure method to ensure your endpoints and servers are not being spied on by foreign governments using products such as FinFisher and FinSpy.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 28, 2013
Even though I am no longer an IBMer, this is still a great report to review trends. The X-Force Blog has posted their highlights, with a link at the bottom to get the full report. I’ve read through the report and here’s some bits I find interesting.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 26, 2013
Bit9 2013 Server Security Survey Shows Concerns
about Targeted Malware Rising
1,000 IT and Security Pros Worldwide are Less Confident about Stopping Threats
WALTHAM, Mass.—March 21, 2013—Bit9, the leader in Trust-based Security, today announced the results of its second annual server security survey of nearly 1,000 IT and security professionals worldwide. Key findings include:
Click here to download the Bit9 2013 Server Security Survey report and the infographic The Truth about Server Security.
“These results highlight the need for greater control in identifying and stopping advanced attacks on valuable server resources—before they execute—while decreasing the security-related administrative workloads of IT and security professionals,” said Brian Hazzard, vice president of product management for Bit9. “The key to securing enterprise servers—both physical and virtual—is to allow only trusted software to execute and prevent all other files from running. That’s how the Bit9 Platform protects our customers’ servers and endpoints against targeted attacks, zero-day threats and all other types of malware.”
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 25, 2013
I live in the far outskirts of Atlanta, Georgia. It’s rural/suburban, with lots of horse farms and country clubs. You never expect to have bad things happen near you home, myself included. However, we do have some local drama that has bled in to my domain of information security. It all started with this:
Authorities are investigating an Acworth teen who allegedly posted naked photos of at least eight children on pornographic websites, according to a Cobb County criminal warrant.
Interesting. At this point I find it odd, but not too interesting. Some kids getting in trouble. Stupid trouble, but it sounds like this guy is not a pedophile. Then more information came out.
The Acworth teen who allegedly posted naked photos of at least eight children on pornographic websites created a company to gain the trust of the juveniles.
Cobb County Police Sgt. Dana Pierce said today that authorities believe Harrison High School senior Michael William Cook operated under the company name Maxi Focus Photography between Nov. 1, 2012, and Jan. 1, 2013, the time frame that he allegedly posted to pornographic websites “naked” or “erotic” photos of people that he obtained through fraudulent means.
Okay, now that steps it up a notch. If true, this guy even got himself a fake business to entice girls. So he may be more of a predator than I first thought. At this point, it’s a wild story, but still a local quirky story. It just happens to be walking distance from my home. I was reading my security blogs this morning and came across this:
A US teenager has been charged with distributing child pornography he allegedly hacked out of minors’ cellphones with a bogus mobile text ad that installed phone-controlling malware.
According to 9News.com, Sgt. Pierce claimed that Cook sent text messages to victims from a company called “Maxi Focus Photography”.
When victims clicked on a link in the text message, it installed malware that essentially gave Cook access to all information stored on the phones.
That includes access to victims’ accounts on social network sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as sexually explicit photos stored on the phones.
Cook allegedly downloaded offensive pictures and sent them to pornographic websites, Pierce said.
Now things are getting very interesting. This is more than just using a fake photography “studio” to convince girls to get naked. This was a lot more sneaky, if true. I’ve done security forensics before and they almost always are child porn cases. For me, I was always helping prove that someone knowingly downloaded child porn, and usually disproving the “It must have been a Virus” defense.
This is different. If true, my neighbor was hacking into phones and stealing nude photos. In my line of work, we talk about the various type of threats we have and what are their motivations. Now we can add perverted 17 year old boys trying to find naked pictures of teenagers. What if can across your banking info? Think he’d buy himself a couple of video games?
I can think of several lessons here:
I’ll keep monitoring the situation and see how things evolve. For this kids sake, I hope it’s not true. We’ll see how the investigation goes.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 23, 2013
I just read a great article by Mark Baggett (@MarkBaggett) on the ISC Diary called Wipe the drive! Stealthy Malware Persistence Mechanism – Part 1 and Wipe the drive! Stealthy Malware Persistence – Part 2. This was from his presentation at Shmoocom 2013. He shows 4 different methods how malware can stick around even after it’s been “cleaned” by anti-malware products. I completely agree with his advice: always “Wipe the Drive”. It’s the only sure fire way to clean the system, but what if you can’t for some reason? Maybe it’s a traveling employee or an executive at a conference. Wiping and re-imaging is a costly procedure in most enterprises.
What if you had Bit9 installed? How would these 4 situations play out? Let’s go through them. Bit 9 can be run in three protection modes: Monitor-only with Advanced Treat Indicators (ATIs), Block & Ask, and Block. If you are running endpoints in Monitor-only mode with ATIs, you would get an alert on your Bit9 console for these actions. This alert could be acted upon within Bit9 or from your SIEM. For the other two modes, I’ll explain how each of these would be blocked, since that’s how most of our customers use Bit9.
TECHNIQUE #1 – File Associations Hijacking
What happens when you click on a .TXT file? The operating system checks the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT hive for the associated extension to see what program it should launch. …
What if the attacker or his malware changes this association? Instead of launching notepad it tells the OS to launch NOTPAD.EXE. NOTPAD.EXE is wrapper around the real NOTEPAD.EXE but it also contains a malicious payload.
This is pretty straightforward. NOTPAD.EXE would be blocked because it isn’t trusted. No matter how you tricked the user into running it, Bit9 is protecting you. When you get the block alert, it’s time to wipe the drive, but only when get around to it… after all, you are protected by Bit9.
TECHNIQUE #2 BITS BACKDOOR
BITS is the Background Intelligent Transfer System. This service is used by your operating system to download patches from Microsoft or your local WSUS server. But this service can also be used to schedule the download of an attacker’s malware to reinfect your system. Once the attacker or his malware are on on your machine he execute BITSADMIN to schedule the download of http://attackersite.com/malware.exe. He schedules the job to only retry the URL once a day and automatically execute the program after it is successfully downloaded. The attacker doesn’t put anything at that URL today. Instead, he simply waits for you to finish your incident handling process and look the other way. You can scan the machine with 100 different virus scanners. Today there is no file on your system to detect. You can do memory forensics all day. Sorry, there is nothing running today. Today it is just a simple configuration change to the OS. Then when he is ready he places malware.exe on his site. Your machine dutifully downloads the new malware and executes it.
Again, this is a very easy use case. malware.exe wouldn’t be allowed to run. When you get the block alert, it’s time to wipe the drive, but only when get around to it. Bit9′s got you covered until then.
TECHNIQUE #3 – Program.exe
When Jake and I were preparing for the Shmoocon talk that we gave on this subject, I suggested we include this technique in our presentation. Jake disagreed because this thing has been around since the year 2000 and I quickly relented and agreed with him. At the time we both thought that this technique is pretty lame and we shouldn’t have to worry about a THIRTEEN YEAR OLD vulnerability. Instead I decided to do a post on the ISC to talk about the technique and see what response we got. The response for you, our awesome supporters, was incredible. ISC readers documented several dozen of these attacks in critical systems common to most corporate desktop images. You made Jake a believer (he had a vulnerable OEM application you found on his laptop). The response was such that I am now convinced that an attacker can use this technique and have a great deal of confidence that his malware will be launched. As a matter of fact, it will probably be launched by something that has system permissions. I won’t repeat the full details of the technique here since I already covered it on the ISC. You can check out this article if you missed it:
This is the scenario. Malware or an attacker is on your machine. He has administrative or Power User access. The attacker drops a file called “program.exe” on the root of your C drive. “program.exe” is a small application that reads the command line parameters that were used to call it. It launches the real program you had intended to call and then executes its malicious payload. Simple but effective.
This one is interesting. When you install the Bit9 agent, it locally approves all files on the system. Then you setup a chain of trust. If you have program.exe on old machines or existing gold images, Bit9 will trust it.
I would advise following the link above and understanding this issue. It’s worth it to review gold images a bit closer when putting them in your trust based architecture in Bit9. When doing this review, it’s a great use case for using cloud based reputation using Bit9′s Software Reputation Service (SRS). If you have any questionable files on your image, run them through SRS. Find out what the world thinks about them. Another bit of advice for vetting gold images: review unsigned code! You can even detonate files in a FireEye MAS, if you have one.
If you do find any malware like this program.exe, globally ban it in Bit9 (and delete it from your gold image)! This will instantly protect all existing computers running the Bit9 agent. Global Bans even work on Bit9 agents running in Monitor-only mode. No need to wipe every drive immediately when you are protected with Bit9.
Technique #4 - Service Failure Recovery Startups
You can configure Windows services with an automatic recovery action. The defined action will be taken when the service crashes unexpectedly. You can see these on the recovery tab for a service using services.msc. Here you see this service first tries to restart the service, then it will …. ummm… whats that?? .. RUN A PROGRAM. Hmm.
This use case is also straightforward. The malware has tricked the user, even tricked the system, but it hasn’t been tricked by Bit9. Blocked, again.
I hope this helps shine the light on the amazing power of software whitelisting. It changes the game in end-point protection. You don’t have to go running after every trick in the book that may trick a user. You only have vet the software you trust, and you don’t have to wipe the drive immediately when an infection occurs. Bit9 gives you the freedom to have endpoint protected while you wipe the drive at your convenience.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 22, 2013
Hear Michael Bilancieri telling the compelling story about our new detection and forensics capabilities and innovative new Advanced Threat Indicators.
Bit9′s Trust-based Security Platform combines real-time sensors, Advanced Threat Indicators (ATI), and the cloud-based Bit9 Software Reputation Service to immediately detect advanced threats and malware. You won’t wait for signature file updates. No testing or updating .dat files. Bit9 specializes in advanced threat detection.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on March 12, 2013
Since moving from network security to endpoint security, I’ve been soaking as much wisdom on various approaches, priorities, and opinions out there. I came across this Gartner study titled “Predicts 2013: Endpoint Security Becomes Even More Important for Infrastructure Protection”. It seems to hit home with many of the viewpoints I am hearing from my customers. The Bit9 web folks have posted a copy on the Bit9 website, but here’s the gist:
- Most endpoint security tools are designed to allow any application to run, unless it is known to be malicious. Restricting applications that are allowed to execute to a known set of preapproved applications is gaining acceptance as a more-effective security measure for dealing with rapidly morphing malware and advanced persistent threats.
- Malware authors typically attack the easiest and most prevalent targets. Mobile devices offer a range of possibilities along these two scales.
- As computer processing is dispersed into operational technology (OT) systems, data sources and access points expand exponentially. Some of these objects will require security due to the sensitivity of the processing they perform and the data they provide, particularly for OT-centric enterprises.
- Most organizations are removing URL blocks and permitting most employees to access external social media from corporate-owned and managed endpoints and networks.
- Consider application control a key requirement of endpoint protection systems. Favor vendors that have mature workflow processes for dealing with change and have large installed bases of users from which to draw samples.
- Focus investments in platforms that have a default-deny application control environment, or be prepared for higher costs and more potential for infections.
- If your enterprise is involved with OT such as supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems, process control, telemetering, sensors or similar OT, immediately try for IT/OT alignment, convergence and integration to develop plans for security oversight.
- End-user organizations should anticipate continued investments in procedures and solutions focused on managing security risks in external social media. However, solutions in this space are immature, and organizations should expect regular changes in feature sets and vendors.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on February 18, 2013
My move from running RedHat on the desktop back to Windows 7 hasn’t been too bumpy. Only one big driver corruption issue that took me a couple of days to solve, but it seems running Windows is like riding a bike. I have a need to scan a good bit of documents into a single Adobe PDF file. The driver & software package that comes with my Lexmark printer only scans to individual files. I had been using PDF Creator, which has a tool to suck up all the individual jpegs and put them in a PDF. It was clunky, and often files would be out of order.
I went on a search today to find another tool to meet my needs. I tried 5 different freeware or shareware programs. The first four didn’t function in some way. Most just errored out, one didn’t even run. I finally found NAPS (Not Another PDF Scanner). The only problem I have is that the default permissions on the program folder in which it runs keeps it from saving a config file. Running it as Administrator worked for setting up my profile. Now it runs fine as under regular permissions.
Just wanted to share to possible save someone else some time. Cheers!
UPDATE; well, NAPS ended up being too buggy for me. I went back to the developer page on Sourceforge and saw a comment that some one else has forked the project. Yay, NAPS 2 is better! Open Source FTW!
Posted by Xavier Ashe on February 5, 2013
From the very start of considering a move from IBM Security Systems to Bit9, I gave a lot of thought to my security philosophy. I really do believe strongly in IBM’s security portfolio, and I wanted to make sure moving to Bit9 didn’t undercut my security philosophy. Working for IBM taught me a lot about holistic security and how good security products are usable no matter if you have basic security maturity, or advanced. I generally focused on the network side of security, mainly in SIEM and NIPS. I’ve shied away from endpoint security (for the exception of dabbling in forensics and TEM), because it’s such a headache. Virus scan software is a joke, letting just about everything modern in. Case in point with the recent attacks at the New York Times:
Over the course of three months, attackers installed 45 pieces of custom malware. The Times — which uses antivirus products made by Symantec — found only one instance in which Symantec identified an attacker’s software as malicious and quarantined it, according to Mandiant.
I see this all the time. That’s why products like QRadar and IBM Security NIDS are so popular. You have to fall back to the network, if can’t get control of the endpoint. Why attack the endpoint? It’s seems to be the easiest and most successful. There’s typically three categories of attacks:
Network based protection is very useful at blocking and/or detecting all three of these attacks categories, but that leaves you with a perimeter based security protection. With perimeter based security, one tries to tackle the channels of infections like email and web browsing. There are tons of solutions that help with this, but nothing helps as soon as that endpoint walks out the door. Network security should be used to protect infrastructure, not endpoints.
So what can be done to protect the endpoint? IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager does a lot to manage all the small stuff like patch management, software delivery, compliance, and virus scanning. I say small stuff, not to dismiss its importance, but they are processes that should be in place already. Having TEM take care of it all is just easier.
When I was at IBM and a customer was worried about the Insider Threat, we would use either TSIEM or QRadar to pull in system and audit logs. What we usually found near pure chaos, since it’s very hard to figure out what is what within system logs. The best approach I have found is using white list policies. We would build profiles of acceptable behavior in an environment, filter it out, then analyze the rest. It was a great approach and bled over into some of my other SIEM and NIPS scenarios.
The reason I bring this up is that one of the reasons I like Bit9′s software is that it employs a similar white list approach, but looks to be MUCH easier than the rat’s nest that is system and audit logs.
Let me summarize:
As I write this out, I see that going after endpoint security with Bit9 fits for me. I am looking forward to learning more about its capabilities and how our customers would like to use it.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on January 27, 2013
As I get more into my Bit9 job, I will be doing a lot more endpoint security. I’ve been on the network side of security for so long, I have some ramping up to do. A very common request is to secure USB devices. Here’s a good article on getting data off a locked down system.
High security workstations have some pretty peculiar ways of securing data. One of these is disabling any USB flash drives that may find their way into a system’s USB port. Security is a cat and mouse game, so of course there’s a way around these measures. [d3ad0ne] came up with a way of dumping files onto an SD card by using the USB HID protocol.
We’ve seen this sort of thing before where a microcontroller carries an executable to extract data. Previously, the best method was to blink the Caps Lock LED on a keyboard, sending one bit at a time to a microcontroller. [d3ad0ne]‘s build exploits the USB HID protocol, but instead of 1 bit per second, he’s getting about 10kBps.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on January 25, 2013
I’ve been running Windows 8 on one my laptops since it’s release and put in the kitchen for my family to use. It’s a powerful laptop, i7, 12 gb RAM, nice graphics card. I’ve used it, as has my wife and my three elementary age kids. My teenagers have their own PCs and laptops. I’m now replacing this laptop (need to give it back to IBM) with another. It has Windows 7 on it. Note, neither laptops have a touchscreen.
My first thought was to reformat with a fresh Windows 8 install, since it will be the new family machine. Windows 8 has family controls built in to the OS, has PIN logons, and the Metro look and feel is very nice. But I started thinking about how many family uses it.
My wife was constantly frustrated about trying to get stuff done on it. The Metro version of IE has some shortcomings, mainly not running flash unless Microsoft approves it. She googled how to recreate a Start button, and if she uses this machine, she goes directly to the desktop. She never used one of the Metro apps, but she also has her own laptop with Windows 7. She installed Chrome and stopped using IE 10.
My boys (ages 6 and 8) love the Bing app. They can spend hours just searching various star wars names and looking at the image results. But IE has problems with various sites like starwars.com and lego.com. I put a Chrome icon on their Metro home page. It of course runs in the desktop.
My 10 year old daughter does a lot of homework online. Half of her sites don’t work in IE 10, so she uses chrome, too. My 8 year old boy attends an online school. Again, IE 10 doesn’t work. Word processing is via Symphony, on the desktop.
Even though I installed a bunch of free Metro games for the kids, they don’t use them. They want the games on PBS, Star Wars, Lego, American Girl, and other web sites. They each got their own Android tablets for Hanukkah, so all those Metro games have similar ports on Android and are more fun to play on a touchscreen device.
The only positive things out of Windows 8 is the Bing Search app, parental controls built it, and my kids learning how to use the new OS. But in the end, most just go to the desktop and launch Chrome. The new laptop has a fingerprint scanner, so there’s no reason for a password or PIN.
I think I will leave Windows 7 on the new family laptop. I get my new work PC next week. I will contemplate putting Windows 8 on there for a while and see how it works for work.
Posted by Xavier Ashe on January 11, 2013
As of February 1st, I will be leaving IBM. It’s been a great 7 years. I never thought I could enjoy working for a large company, or working so long in the same position. Man was I wrong. IBM really has some great people, and I had the best quality of life during my tenure. Even though I was in the same position, life was rarely dull with constant acquisitions (nearly one per year that affected me!). I started off working with NeuSecure/TSOM, then TDI, then TCIM, then TSIEM, then AppScan, then Proventia and SiteProtector, then BigFix/TEM, and finally QRadar. That’s a busy seven years!
Well, what’s next? I have accepted a position at Bit9 as a client partner. I am excited about this on several fronts. One, I think the technology is amazing. I’ve never been a big supporter of virus scan products. They just never seem to offer adequate protection. Bit9′s approach is to whitelist the good stuff as opposed to trying to find all the bad stuff. I really think this is a better way to secure endpoints. I’ll be posting more on my security philosophy soon.
Secondly, I’m excited to be moving to a small company. Not only is moving to a start-up* exciting, the people there are too. Everyone I’ve talked to so far seems to be on the same page as me when it comes to security philosophy, business philosophy, and look to be very fun to work with. I was lucky to find a good crew at IBM, and it looks like my luck continues at Bit9.
Also the client partner role looks to be very fulfilling. When I look back on my time at IBM, I really enjoyed the time that I could form long-term relationships with my customers. That’s also where I found the greatest success. This position looks to mix engagement management, relationship management, and technical account management. I’m also planning on doing some evangelist work too.
I am so excited to get started at Bit9 in February. I will have to spend some time deprogramming myself as an IBMer, but I think this is a good move with a good company with a great product.
* Bit9′s been around for about 7 years and can hardly be called a start-up anymore. But every company seems like start-up when coming from IBM.